Tier 1 — highest

Efficacy and safety of vitamin K2 for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at a long-term follow-up: meta-analysis and systematic review

Ming Zhou, Shiliang Han, Wenpeng Zhang, Dan Wu
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism 2022 40(5):763-772

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 35711002
Funding
Support is recorded from the Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province. See the original publication for grant and material-support details.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration is not available in the indexed abstract or accessible disclosure metadata.

Study snapshot

DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis
ModelHuman evidence synthesis
Sample9 randomized trials involving 6,853 participants
InterventionDifferent K2 regimens in postmenopausal osteoporosis
DurationLonger-term follow-up; varied by trial
EndpointsBone mineral density; Osteocalcin; Adverse reactions

What the study showed, in plain terms

This publication examines bone mineral density, osteocalcin, adverse reactions. Study population or evidence base: 9 randomized trials involving 6,853 participants. Intervention or exposure: Different K2 regimens in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Key findings

Pooling favored K2 for lumbar and forearm bone-density measures and osteocalcin outcomes. Adverse reactions were more frequent overall, although the review reported no serious K2-related events.

What this study can and cannot tell us

Formulations, co-treatments and trial methods differed. This review overlaps other K2 meta-analyses and is not an independent set of participants.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified

Biohack Blueprint Research