Tier 4 — mechanistic

Variability of plasma and urine betaine in diabetes mellitus and its relationship to methionine load test responses: an observational study

Michael Lever, Sandy Slow, David O McGregor, Warwick J Dellow, Peter M George, Stephen T Chambers
Cardiovascular diabetology 2012 11:34

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 22510294
PubMed Central
PMC3395555
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or accessible funding metadata.
Competing interests
Reported disclosure: Competing interestsThere are no competing interests to declare.

Study snapshot

DesignObservational challenge study
ModelHuman participants
Sample34 adults with type 2 diabetes and 17 controls
InterventionMeasured betaine status and related metabolites; no randomized TMG treatment
DurationFasting and post-methionine testing
EndpointsDiabetes; Betaine variability; Homocysteine

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2012, this source examined human observational and biomarker research. Design: Observational challenge study. Sample/model: 34 adults with type 2 diabetes and 17 controls. The exposure or intervention was Measured betaine status and related metabolites; no randomized TMG treatment. Follow-up or treatment period: Fasting and post-methionine testing.

Betaine levels and urinary losses were more variable in diabetes, and circulating betaine predicted post-load homocysteine responses.

Observational exposure analysis: residual confounding and reverse causation remain possible. Associations do not establish that betaine supplementation causes the same outcome.

Continue with TMG Data Center

Continue with TMG for Weight Loss: Body-Fat Findings and Their Limits

Key findings

  • Betaine levels and urinary losses were more variable in diabetes, and circulating betaine predicted post-load homocysteine responses.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Diabetes; Betaine variability; Homocysteine.
  • The exposure was observed rather than assigned as an isolated supplement treatment.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Observational exposure analysis: residual confounding and reverse causation remain possible. Associations do not establish that betaine supplementation causes the same outcome.
  • Confounding, dietary patterns, illness, medication use and reverse causation can influence an association. Blood or dietary concentrations do not identify the effect of starting a capsule.
  • Source basis: Accessible full-text extract plus indexed bibliographic data. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified