Tier 2 — strong

Low dose betaine supplementation leads to immediate and long term lowering of plasma homocysteine in healthy men and women

Margreet R Olthof, Trinette van Vliet, Esther Boelsma, Petra Verhoef
The Journal of nutrition 2003 133(12):4135-4138

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 14652361
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or accessible funding metadata.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or accessible disclosure metadata.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized controlled trial
ModelHuman participants
Sample76 healthy adults; four groups of 19
InterventionBetaine 1.5, 3 or 6 g/day versus placebo
Duration6 weeks
EndpointsHomocysteine; Dose response

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2003, this source examined homocysteine, methylation and vascular function. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Sample/model: 76 healthy adults; four groups of 19. The exposure or intervention was Betaine 1.5, 3 or 6 g/day versus placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 6 weeks.

Fasting homocysteine was approximately 12%, 15% and 20% lower than placebo at increasing doses. The rise after a methionine challenge was also reduced.

Short biochemical study; cardiovascular events and longevity were not measured.

Continue with TMG Data Center

Continue with TMG and Homocysteine: How Much Can Betaine Lower It?

Key findings

  • Fasting homocysteine was approximately 12%, 15% and 20% lower than placebo at increasing doses.
  • The rise after a methionine challenge was also reduced.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Homocysteine; Dose response.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Betaine 1.5, 3 or 6 g/day versus placebo; 6 weeks.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Short biochemical study; cardiovascular events and longevity were not measured.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Source basis: Indexed abstract and bibliographic data. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

5 articles

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified