Tier 2 — strong

Effect of quercetin supplementation on maximal oxygen uptake in men and women

Matthew S Ganio, Lawrence E Armstrong, Evan C Johnson, Jennifer F Klau, Kevin D Ballard, Bozena Michniak-Kohn, Diksha Kaushik, Carl M Maresh
Journal of sports sciences 2010 28(2):201

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 20054739
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover exercise trial
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample11 sedentary adults
InterventionQuercetin 1,000 mg/day in food bars or placebo
Duration5 days; 22-day washout
EndpointsExercise performance or recovery

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2010, this source examined exercise and recovery. Design: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover exercise trial. Sample/model: 11 sedentary adults. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin 1,000 mg/day in food bars or placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 5 days; 22-day washout.

Maximal oxygen uptake and related physiological measures did not improve.

Small and short study. The null result should be considered alongside the mixed findings from other exercise trials.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Exercise: Performance, Recovery and Muscle. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Maximal oxygen uptake and related physiological measures did not improve.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Exercise performance or recovery.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin 1,000 mg/day in food bars or placebo; 5 days; 22-day washout.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Small and short study. The null result should be considered alongside the mixed findings from other exercise trials.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified