Tier 2 — strong

Quercetin's effect on cycling efficiency and substrate utilization

Charles L Dumke, David C Nieman, Alan C Utter, Michael D Rigby, John C Quindry, N Travis Triplett, Steven R McAnulty, Lisa S McAnulty
Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme 2009 34(6):993

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 20029506
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized placebo-controlled exercise trial
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample40 trained cyclists
InterventionQuercetin 1,000 mg/day or placebo
Duration3 weeks before three consecutive 3-hour cycling days
EndpointsExercise performance or recovery

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2009, this source examined exercise and recovery. Design: Randomized placebo-controlled exercise trial. Sample/model: 40 trained cyclists. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin 1,000 mg/day or placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 3 weeks before three consecutive 3-hour cycling days.

Quercetin did not improve cycling efficiency, substrate use, perceived effort, or measured metabolic responses.

Short trial in trained cyclists; results may share a research program with related exercise reports and should not be treated as proof of benefit in other populations.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Exercise: Performance, Recovery and Muscle. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Quercetin did not improve cycling efficiency, substrate use, perceived effort, or measured metabolic responses.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Exercise performance or recovery.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin 1,000 mg/day or placebo; 3 weeks before three consecutive 3-hour cycling days.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Short trial in trained cyclists; results may share a research program with related exercise reports and should not be treated as proof of benefit in other populations.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified