Tier 1 — highest

Comparative Clinical Study on Magnesium Absorption and Side Effects After Oral Intake of Microencapsulated Magnesium (MAGSHAPETM Microcapsules) Versus Other Magnesium Sources

David Pajuelo, Justyna M Meissner, Teresa Negra, Alan Connolly, Jose L Mullor
Nutrients 2024 16(24):4367

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 39770988
PubMed Central
PMC11677548
Funding
Support is recorded from Lubrizol Life Science. See the original publication for grant and material-support details.
Competing interests
The source discloses financial, employment, advisory or material-support relationships involving Lubrizol. See the publication for the authors and nature of each relationship.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized, double-blind, crossover bioavailability study
ModelHuman participants
Sample40 healthy adults
InterventionMicroencapsulated magnesium compared with oxide, citrate and bisglycinate
DurationAcute measurements through 6 hours after dosing
EndpointsPlasma magnesium; Gastrointestinal tolerability

What the study showed, in plain terms

This publication examines plasma magnesium, gastrointestinal tolerability. Study population or evidence base: 40 healthy adults. Intervention or exposure: Microencapsulated magnesium compared with oxide, citrate and bisglycinate.

Key findings

The microencapsulated preparation produced a more sustained plasma-magnesium increase and favorable tolerability measures in this short comparison.

What this study can and cannot tell us

Branded formulation study using short-term plasma concentrations. The findings cannot establish that all bisglycinate products are poorly absorbed or that one preparation improves clinical outcomes.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified

Biohack Blueprint Research