Tier 1 — highest
Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The American journal of clinical nutrition
2012
95(6):1357-64
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 22552031
- PubMed Central
- PMC3349454
- Funding
- Support is recorded from Medical Research Council, Department of Health, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. See the original publication for grant and material-support details.
- Competing interests
- A competing-interest declaration is not available in the indexed abstract or accessible disclosure metadata.
Study snapshot
| Design | Systematic review and meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| Model | Human evidence synthesis |
| Sample | Randomized trials directly comparing D2 and D3; search through July 2011 |
| Intervention | Vitamin D2 versus D3 with differing administration schedules |
| Duration | Varied across trials |
| Endpoints | Serum total 25(OH)D |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified
Biohack Blueprint Research
