Tier 1 — highest

The effects of Quercetin supplementation on cardiometabolic outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Seyyed Mostafa Arabi, Mostafa Shahraki Jazinaki, Mahla Chambari, Leila Sadat Bahrami, Mohsen Maleki, Vasily N Sukhorukov, Amirhossein Sahebkar
Phytotherapy research : PTR 2023 37(11):5080-5091

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 37654199
Funding
Indexed grant support: 22-15-00064 — Russian Science Foundation. The indexed list may not contain the complete funding declaration.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignUmbrella review of randomized-trial meta-analyses
ModelHuman evidence synthesis
Sample5 meta-analyses covering 18 eligible trials, plus 5 additional trials
InterventionQuercetin supplementation across trial-specific regimens
DurationLiterature search to the review cutoff
EndpointsBlood pressure; Glucose and insulin measures

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2023, this source examined cardiovascular and metabolic health. Its evidence base was 5 meta-analyses covering 18 eligible trials, plus 5 additional trials. It evaluated Quercetin supplementation across trial-specific regimens across Literature search to the review cutoff.

Systolic pressure and insulin decreased modestly; most other cardiometabolic outcomes did not improve.

Very low-to-moderate certainty and substantial heterogeneity. Overlapping meta-analyses should not be counted as independent confirmations or participant populations.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Weight Loss, Blood Sugar and Fatty Liver: Human Evidence. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Systolic pressure and insulin decreased modestly; most other cardiometabolic outcomes did not improve.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Blood pressure; Glucose and insulin measures.
  • This synthesis reuses the included study populations; it is not an additional randomized participant cohort.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Very low-to-moderate certainty and substantial heterogeneity. Overlapping meta-analyses should not be counted as independent confirmations or participant populations.
  • Pooled estimates depend on the included trials and may share participants with companion publications or other reviews. A statistically significant surrogate outcome does not establish disease prevention.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified