Tier 2 — strong

The effects of quercetin supplementation on cognitive functioning in a community sample: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Joshua J Broman-Fulks, Will H Canu, Krystal L Trout, David C Nieman
Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology 2012 2(4):131

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 23983966
PubMed Central
PMC3736941
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
Reported disclosure: statement: D.C. Nieman is a board member of Quercegen Pharma. The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized placebo-controlled community cognition trial
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample941 adults
InterventionQuercetin 500 or 1,000 mg/day or placebo
Duration12 weeks
EndpointsExposure and pharmacokinetics; Cognitive, mood, or sleep measures

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2012, this source examined brain, cognition and sleep. Design: Randomized placebo-controlled community cognition trial. Sample/model: 941 adults. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin 500 or 1,000 mg/day or placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 12 weeks.

Memory, attention, reaction time, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility did not improve despite higher plasma quercetin.

An outcome report from the same large community supplementation program; it should not be counted as an independent cohort from related reports.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Brain Fog, Memory and Sleep: Human Evidence. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Memory, attention, reaction time, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility did not improve despite higher plasma quercetin.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Exposure and pharmacokinetics; Cognitive, mood, or sleep measures.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin 500 or 1,000 mg/day or placebo; 12 weeks.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • An outcome report from the same large community supplementation program; it should not be counted as an independent cohort from related reports.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Companion or correction records are linked below. They should not be counted automatically as independent replications; see the individual source notes for the relationship.
  • Source basis: Source check: accessible full text and indexed metadata. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

2 articles

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified