Tier 2 — strong

Quercetin does not affect rating of perceived exertion in athletes during the Western States endurance run

Alan C Utter, David C Nieman, Jie Kang, Charles L Dumke, John C Quindry, Steven R McAnulty, Lisa S McAnulty
Research in sports medicine (Print) 2009 17(2):71

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 19479626
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized double-blind placebo-controlled ultramarathon trial
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample63 randomized runners; 39 finishers
InterventionQuercetin 1,000 mg/day or placebo
Duration3 weeks before a 160-km race
EndpointsSource-specific outcomes described in the key findings

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2009, this source examined exercise and recovery. Design: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled ultramarathon trial. Sample/model: 63 randomized runners; 39 finishers. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin 1,000 mg/day or placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 3 weeks before a 160-km race.

Perceived exertion and finishing times did not differ between groups.

Finisher analyses and a specialized endurance setting limit generalization. This reports another outcome from the same Western States trial.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Exercise: Performance, Recovery and Muscle. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Perceived exertion and finishing times did not differ between groups.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Source-specific outcomes described in the key findings.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin 1,000 mg/day or placebo; 3 weeks before a 160-km race.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Finisher analyses and a specialized endurance setting limit generalization. This reports another outcome from the same Western States trial.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Companion or correction records are linked below. They should not be counted automatically as independent replications; see the individual source notes for the relationship.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified