Tier 2 — strong

Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Qiao M, Lei C, Tan C, Lu C, Chen Z, Zhang Q, Wang Z
Pharmaceutical biology 2023 61(1):1474-1483

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 37855412
PubMed Central
PMC10588516
Funding
Reported funding sources: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CACMS) Innovation Fund10.13039/501100005892. Grant and funder-role details are in the publication.
Competing interests
The authors declared no competing interests in the publication.

Study snapshot

DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis
ModelPublished human studies
Sample10 randomized trials; 896 participants
InterventionEvidence synthesis; interventions and comparators vary across included studies
DurationNo new treatment; included-study durations vary
EndpointsPooled clinical or metabolic outcomes; Risk of bias and heterogeneity; Adverse-event reporting

What the study showed, in plain terms

Adjunctive berberine showed a signal for ventricular ectopy outcomes, while berberine alone did not clearly outperform antiarrhythmic comparators.

Key findings

  • Adjunctive berberine showed a signal for ventricular ectopy outcomes, while berberine alone did not clearly outperform antiarrhythmic comparators.

What this study can and cannot tell us

Variable effective-rate definitions and limited safety ascertainment; this cannot exclude rare QT-related adverse events.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified