Tier 2 — strong

Betaine Supplementation Does Not Improve Muscle Hypertrophy or Strength Following 6 Weeks of Cross-Fit Training

Tatiana Moro, Francesca Badiali, Iader Fabbri, Antonio Paoli
Nutrients 2020 12(6):1688

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 32516959
PubMed Central
PMC7352895
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or accessible funding metadata.
Competing interests
Reported disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized controlled trial
ModelHuman participants
Sample29 trained CrossFit participants
InterventionBetaine versus placebo alongside CrossFit training
Duration6 weeks
EndpointsStrength; Body composition; CrossFit performance

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2020, this source examined exercise performance and body composition. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Sample/model: 29 trained CrossFit participants. The exposure or intervention was Betaine versus placebo alongside CrossFit training. Follow-up or treatment period: 6 weeks.

No significant between-group improvement was found in strength, body composition, hydration or CrossFit-specific aerobic and anaerobic tests.

An improvement within the betaine group alone does not demonstrate superiority to placebo. Modest sample and short duration.

Continue with TMG Data Center

Continue with TMG for Weight Loss: Body-Fat Findings and Their Limits

Key findings

  • No significant between-group improvement was found in strength, body composition, hydration or CrossFit-specific aerobic and anaerobic tests.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Strength; Body composition; CrossFit performance.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Betaine versus placebo alongside CrossFit training; 6 weeks.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • An improvement within the betaine group alone does not demonstrate superiority to placebo. Modest sample and short duration.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Source basis: Accessible full-text extract plus indexed bibliographic data. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

2 articles

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified