Correction to: Single-cell profiling reveals a potent role of quercetin in promoting hair regeneration

Protein & cell 2025 16(10):916

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 40391738
PubMed Central
PMC12578280
Funding
Funding was not confirmed from the indexed record; consult the original publication.
Competing interests
Competing interests were not confirmed from the indexed record; consult the original publication.

Study snapshot

DesignPublished correction linked to the mouse hair-regeneration paper
ModelBibliographic correction record
SampleNo independent participant or animal cohort reported in this bibliographic notice
InterventionNot applicable: correction notice
DurationNot applicable
EndpointsPublication correction

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2025, this source examined skin and topical formulations. It is retained for source traceability. PubMed lists no abstract. The detailed correction text was not independently retrieved, so its specific changes are not summarized here. This is not new efficacy evidence.

The publication corrects the earlier hair-regeneration report and must be read alongside it.

PubMed lists no abstract. The detailed correction text was not independently retrieved, so its specific changes are not summarized here. This is not new efficacy evidence.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Skin and Hair: Oral vs Topical Evidence. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • The publication corrects the earlier hair-regeneration report and must be read alongside it.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Publication correction.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • PubMed lists no abstract. The detailed correction text was not independently retrieved, so its specific changes are not summarized here. This is not new efficacy evidence.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed indexed correction metadata; no abstract and detailed correction text not independently retrieved. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified