Tier 2 — strong

Effects of quercetin supplementation on endothelial dysfunction biomarkers and depression in post-myocardial infarction patients: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Fereshteh Dehghani, Mohammadreza Vafa, Ali Ebrahimkhani, Mihnea-Alexandru Găman, Seyed Hashem Sezavar Seyedi Jandaghi
Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2023 56:73-80

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 37344086
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
Reported disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample88 post-infarction adults randomized; 76 completed
InterventionQuercetin 500 mg/day versus placebo
Duration8 weeks
EndpointsSource-specific outcomes described in the key findings

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2023, this source examined cardiovascular and metabolic health. Design: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Sample/model: 88 post-infarction adults randomized; 76 completed. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin 500 mg/day versus placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 8 weeks.

Quercetin did not significantly improve ICAM-1, VCAM-1 or depression compared with placebo.

Specific secondary-prevention population and short follow-up. Companion inflammatory-outcome reports use the same registered trial.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin and Blood Pressure: How Large Is the Effect?. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Quercetin did not significantly improve ICAM-1, VCAM-1 or depression compared with placebo.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Source-specific outcomes described in the key findings.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin 500 mg/day versus placebo; 8 weeks.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Specific secondary-prevention population and short follow-up. Companion inflammatory-outcome reports use the same registered trial.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Companion or correction records are linked below. They should not be counted automatically as independent replications; see the individual source notes for the relationship.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified