Tier 2 — strong

No evidence for a thermic effect of the dietary flavonol quercetin: a pilot study in healthy normal-weight women

Sarah Egert, Gerald Rimbach, Manfred James Müller
European journal of applied physiology 2011 111(5):869

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 20924595
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover calorimetry pilot
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample6 healthy normal-weight women
InterventionQuercetin aglycone 150 mg or placebo
Duration3-hour acute measurement and 24-hour follow-up
EndpointsSource-specific outcomes described in the key findings

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2011, this source examined liver and metabolic health. Design: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover calorimetry pilot. Sample/model: 6 healthy normal-weight women. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin aglycone 150 mg or placebo. Follow-up or treatment period: 3-hour acute measurement and 24-hour follow-up.

Resting energy expenditure and respiratory quotient were not improved relative to placebo.

Very small acute trial; it provides no support for a thermogenic or weight-loss effect under the tested conditions.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Weight Loss, Blood Sugar and Fatty Liver: Human Evidence. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Resting energy expenditure and respiratory quotient were not improved relative to placebo.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Source-specific outcomes described in the key findings.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin aglycone 150 mg or placebo; 3-hour acute measurement and 24-hour follow-up.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Very small acute trial; it provides no support for a thermogenic or weight-loss effect under the tested conditions.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified