Tier 2 — strong
Efficacy and Tolerability of an Undenatured Type II Collagen Supplement in Modulating Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms: A Multicenter Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
Nutrition Journal
2016
15:14
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 26822714
- PubMed Central
- PMC4731911
- Funding
- InterHealth Nutraceuticals, Inc. (Benicia, CA) sponsored and managed the trial; data collection was carried out independently by Laila Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., India, and data analyses were performed by an independent statistician. Biohack Blueprint assessment: two of the three authors (JPL, ZMS) are employees of InterHealth Nutraceuticals, the manufacturer and sponsor of the UC-II product tested. The third author (NEL) provided consulting services to InterHealth. This is disclosed in the article's Competing Interests section.
- Competing interests
- JPL and ZMS are employees of InterHealth Nutraceuticals. NEL provided consulting services to InterHealth. This study was sponsored by InterHealth Nutraceuticals, Inc. Benicia, CA. The study was run and managed independently by Laila Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., India. Data collection was done by the clinical study staff at each respective site. Data analyses was performed by an independent statistician.
Study snapshot
| Design | Multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial |
|---|---|
| Model | Adults aged 40–75 years with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grade 2 or 3) |
| Sample | n=191 randomised (UC-II n=63; glucosamine hydrochloride + chondroitin sulfate [GC] n=66; placebo n=62); n=186 eligible for efficacy/safety analysis; n=164 completers |
| Intervention | Undenatured type II collagen (UC-II), 40 mg/day (delivering 1.2 mg of undenatured type II collagen as determined by validated ELISA) vs glucosamine hydrochloride 1500 mg/day plus chondroitin sulfate 1200 mg/day (GC) vs placebo, for 180 days. This is a microgram-to-low-milligram oral-tolerance-type dose of undenatured collagen — mechanistically and quantitatively distinct from gram-scale hydrolysed collagen peptide supplementation reviewed elsewhere on this site. |
| Duration | 180 days, with interim assessments at days 1, 7, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 |
| Endpoints | Total WOMAC score (pain, stiffness, physical function) — primary; Lequesne Functional Index (LFI); Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain; WOMAC subscales; Knee flexion range of motion; Serum biomarker COMP; serum CRP; synovial IL-6 and MMP-3 (protocol 003348 only) |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
- Hydrolysed vs Non-Hydrolysed Collagen: Why the Difference MattersHydrolysed collagen, gelatin and undenatured Type II collagen are different preparations with different properties and evidence. Here’s what hydrolysis changes—and what it...Read analysis
- Hydrolysed Collagen Peptides: Benefits, Dosage, Safety & EvidenceA complete evidence-graded guide to hydrolysed collagen peptides: what human studies suggest for skin, joints and bone, where evidence is uncertain, plus...Read analysis
- Collagen for Joints: Knee Pain & Osteoarthritis EvidenceSome hydrolysed collagen preparations improve osteoarthritis or activity-related joint symptoms in trials, but results vary by product, dose and population. Pain relief...Read analysis
- Collagen and Kidney Stones: Hydroxyproline & OxalateHydroxyproline can increase urinary oxalate at higher studied intakes, but collagen supplements have not been shown to cause kidney stones in controlled...Read analysis
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified



