Tier 2 — strong

Randomized crossover clinical trial of coenzyme Q10 and nicotinamide riboside in chronic kidney disease

Armin Ahmadi, Gwenaelle Begue, Ana P Valencia, Jennifer E Norman, Benjamin Lidgard, Brian J Bennett, Matthew P Van Doren, David J Marcinek, Sili Fan, David K Prince, Jorge Gamboa, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Ian H de Boer, Bryan R Kestenbaum, Baback Roshanravan
JCI Insight 2023 8(11):e167274

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 37159264
PubMed Central
PMC10393227
Funding
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases / NIH grants R01 DK101509, R03 DK114502 and R01 DK125794.
Competing interests
The authors declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-treatment crossover trial with six possible treatment sequences; each six-week period separated by a one-week washout.
ModelAdults aged 30–79 with CKD, eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² and 6-minute walking distance <550 m; dialysis and kidney-transplant patients excluded.
Sample25 participants; mean age 61.0 ± 11.6 years; mean eGFR 36.9 ± 9.2 mL/min/1.73 m².
InterventionCoQ10 1,200 mg/day (Tishcon), nicotinamide riboside 1,000 mg/day (Niagen), and placebo, each for six weeks in crossover sequence.
DurationThree 6-week treatment periods separated by 1-week washouts; trial conducted November 2018–April 2021.
EndpointsPrimary: VO2 peak; Primary: work efficiency during graded cycle ergometry; Total work; Submaximal VO2; eGFR; Plasma metabolomics; Plasma lipidomics

What the study showed, in plain terms

This rigorously blinded crossover study tested a very high CoQ10 dose—1,200 mg/day—for six weeks in 25 adults with moderate-to-severe CKD. Each participant also received nicotinamide riboside and placebo in separate periods, allowing within-person comparison.

CoQ10 did not improve the prespecified physical-performance outcomes: VO2 peak, total work or work efficiency were not different from placebo. eGFR was also unchanged. The trial therefore provides direct null evidence against assuming that a biochemical mitochondrial intervention automatically improves exercise capacity in CKD.

CoQ10 did alter the circulating metabolic profile, increasing free fatty acids and decreasing complex medium- and long-chain triglycerides. Those biochemical shifts are mechanistically interesting but are not equivalent to improved physical function or kidney-disease progression.

Key findings

  • VO2 peak: no significant improvement with CoQ10 versus placebo (reported p=0.17 for CoQ10 comparison).
  • Total work and total work efficiency were also null versus placebo (reported p=0.77 and p=0.55 for CoQ10 comparisons).
  • eGFR did not change with CoQ10 (reported p=0.88).
  • CoQ10 shifted lipidomics: free fatty acids increased and complex medium-/long-chain triglycerides decreased.
  • Trial registration: NCT03579693. Identical-looking tablets and blinding of participants, physicians, assessors and staff strengthened internal validity.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Only 25 participants, so the trial was designed for physiologic rather than hard renal or cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Each exposure lasted six weeks; longer treatment could produce different effects.
  • The study addresses exercise tolerance and circulating metabolism, not progression to dialysis, cardiovascular events or mortality.
  • The tested dose was 1,200 mg/day, far above common supplement doses, so null results should not be generalized mechanically to every dose/formulation.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

2 articles

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified