Tier 2 — strong

Effectiveness of the quercetin use in patients with COVID-19 with concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus

Zoriana Tylishchak, Oleksandra Pryshliak, Oleksandr Boichuk, Sergiy Fedorov, Andrii Protsyk, Taras Kobryn, Ruslan Miziuk
Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960) 2024 77(10):1962-1968

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 39661889
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignComparative hospitalized COVID-19 study
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample60 patients with type 2 diabetes; 30 per group
InterventionIntravenous quercetin 0.5 g/day plus protocol care versus protocol care
Duration10 days
EndpointsInflammatory measures

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2024, this source examined immunity and respiratory health. Design: Comparative hospitalized COVID-19 study. Sample/model: 60 patients with type 2 diabetes; 30 per group. The exposure or intervention was Intravenous quercetin 0.5 g/day plus protocol care versus protocol care. Follow-up or treatment period: 10 days.

The authors report improved inflammatory, oxygenation, and capillaroscopy measures in the adjunct group.

Allocation methods and robust between-group clinical event estimates are not established in the abstract. Intravenous treatment is not oral supplementation, and thrombosis prevention was not demonstrated.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin for Immune Health, Colds and COVID-19. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • The authors report improved inflammatory, oxygenation, and capillaroscopy measures in the adjunct group.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Inflammatory measures.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Intravenous quercetin 0.5 g/day plus protocol care versus protocol care; 10 days.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Allocation methods and robust between-group clinical event estimates are not established in the abstract. Intravenous treatment is not oral supplementation, and thrombosis prevention was not demonstrated.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified