Tier 2 — strong

Quercetin supplementation and its effect on human monocyte gene expression profiles in vivo

Inka Boomgaarden, Sarah Egert, Gerald Rimbach, Siegfried Wolffram, Manfred J Müller, Frank Döring
The British journal of nutrition 2010 104(3):336

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 20416132
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata available for this entry.
Competing interests
A competing-interest declaration was not available in the indexed record or the disclosure metadata used for this entry.

Study snapshot

DesignHuman gene-expression discovery study with placebo-controlled crossover verification
ModelHuman intervention research
Sample20 participants in the verification cohort; discovery sample not specified in the abstract
InterventionQuercetin 150 mg/day in the verification study
Duration2-week discovery intervention; 6-week crossover periods in verification
EndpointsSource-specific outcomes described in the key findings

What the study showed, in plain terms

Published in 2010, this source examined evidence reviews and human mechanisms. Design: Human gene-expression discovery study with placebo-controlled crossover verification. Sample/model: 20 participants in the verification cohort; discovery sample not specified in the abstract. The exposure or intervention was Quercetin 150 mg/day in the verification study. Follow-up or treatment period: 2-week discovery intervention; 6-week crossover periods in verification.

Initial microarray signals were poorly replicated; only small changes in a few targets distinguished quercetin from placebo.

Exploratory transcriptomics with weak independent confirmation. Gene-expression signals do not establish clinical benefit or a reliably activated longevity pathway.

Continue with Quercetin Data Center

For topic-level interpretation, read Quercetin Benefits: What Human Studies Actually Show. This is a related guide; the citation panel separately identifies articles that directly cite this paper.

Key findings

  • Initial microarray signals were poorly replicated; only small changes in a few targets distinguished quercetin from placebo.
  • The recorded outcome domains were Source-specific outcomes described in the key findings.
  • The result applies to the tested exposure: Quercetin 150 mg/day in the verification study; 2-week discovery intervention; 6-week crossover periods in verification.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Exploratory transcriptomics with weak independent confirmation. Gene-expression signals do not establish clinical benefit or a reliably activated longevity pathway.
  • An individual controlled trial must be interpreted alongside its comparator, sample size, endpoint selection and independent replication. It does not validate a different commercial formulation or a general longevity claim.
  • Companion or correction records are linked below. They should not be counted automatically as independent replications; see the individual source notes for the relationship.
  • Source basis: Source check: PubMed abstract and indexed metadata; full methods were not independently confirmed for this entry. Missing method details, funding information or participant denominators are not inferred.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified