Tier 2 — strong

Neuroprotective effects of glycine for therapy of acute ischaemic stroke

Gusev EI, Skvortsova VI, Dambinova SA, Raevskiy KS, Alekseev AA, Bashkatova VG, Kovalenko AV, Kudrin VS, Yakovleva EV
Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2000 10(1):49-60

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 10629347
Funding
Funding was not specified in the indexed abstract; the full funding disclosure has not been verified.
Competing interests
The accessible abstract does not establish the authors' competing interests; absence of a statement is not evidence of no conflicts.

Study snapshot

DesignRandomized controlled human intervention
ModelAdult humans
Sample200 acute ischemic-stroke patients randomized across four groups
InterventionSublingual glycine 0.5, 1 or 2 g/day versus placebo, started within 6 hours
Duration5 days treatment; clinical outcomes assessed through 30 days
EndpointsNeurological scales; Functional outcome; Mortality; Sedation

What the study showed, in plain terms

A historical acute-stroke study reported favorable findings on selected neurological and functional outcomes. It used urgent sublingual treatment under clinical supervision.

Key findings

  • Selected clinical scales favored the 1–2 g/day groups.
  • Mortality differences were described as trends rather than established survival benefit.
  • Slight sedation was recorded in nine participants.

What this study can and cannot tell us

A single older study does not establish modern stroke efficacy or change emergency-care standards.

Its acute disease setting and route do not establish benefits of chronic oral supplementation.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified