Tier 3 — preclinical
Still reduced cardiovascular mortality 12 years after supplementation with selenium and coenzyme Q10 for four years: A validation of previous 10-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in elderly
PLOS ONE
2018
13(4):e0193120
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 29641571
- PubMed Central
- PMC5894963
- Trial registry
- View on ClinicalTrials.gov Registered trial — results not yet published in a peer-reviewed journal.
- Funding
- Part of the analysis costs was supported by Pharma Nord A/S, the County Council of Östergötland and Linköping University. The funding organizations were reported to have no role in design, management, analysis, interpretation or manuscript preparation.
- Competing interests
- The publication disclosed that the work was partially supported by Pharma Nord through trial tablets/capsules; the authors reported no patents or products in development and stated this did not alter adherence to PLOS policies.
Study snapshot
| Design | Twelve-year mortality follow-up of a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled four-year intervention; intention-to-treat analyses based on original assignment. |
|---|---|
| Model | Original community-dwelling older Swedish KiSel-10 cohort. |
| Sample | 443 original randomized participants: 221 active combination and 222 placebo; no participant lost to mortality follow-up. |
| Intervention | Original four-year Bio-Quinon CoQ10 200 mg/day + SelenoPrecise selenium 200 µg/day versus placebo; supplementation ended at 48 months. |
| Duration | Four-year intervention with cardiovascular mortality follow-up to a median about 12 years. |
| Endpoints | Cardiovascular mortality at 12 years; Univariate and multivariable Cox hazard ratios; Subgroups: ischemic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, NYHA III |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified



