Tier 1 — highest

Effects of Collagen Supplements on Skin Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Seung-Kwon Myung, Yunseo Park
The American Journal of Medicine 2025 138(9):1264–1277

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 40324552
Funding
The 2025 paper reports no external funding.
Competing interests
Authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Study snapshot

DesignMeta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials; prespecified subgroup analyses by funding and study quality
ModelAdults receiving oral collagen or placebo in skin-aging RCTs
Sample23 RCTs; 1,474 participants
InterventionMixed oral collagen supplements vs controls; multiple products and sources
DurationVaried among the 23 RCTs
EndpointsSkin hydration; Skin elasticity; Wrinkles; Industry funding and study-quality sensitivity

What the study showed, in plain terms

Pooled RCTs favored collagen, but independent/non-pharmaceutical-funded and higher-quality trial subgroups showed no significant benefit for hydration, elasticity, or wrinkles. This directly challenges unequivocal skin-aging claims.

Key findings

The significant pooled skin signal was concentrated in manufacturer-funded/lower-quality studies; high-quality and non-pharmaceutical-funded subgroups were null.

What this study can and cannot tell us

Subgroup results may have lower power; pooled interventions are heterogeneous and do not specifically test DoNotAge's finished bovine collagen product. Do not claim the analysis disproves every preparation; reconcile conflicting reviews.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

5 articles

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified