Tier 2 — strong

Enhanced bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of a novel hybrid-hydrogel formulation of fisetin orally administered in healthy individuals: a randomised double-blinded comparative crossover study

Illathu Madhavamenon Krishnakumar, Asha Jaja-Chimedza, Ashil Joseph, Abhilash Balakrishnan, Balu Maliakel, Andrew Swick
Journal of Nutritional Science 2022 11:e74

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 36304817
PubMed Central
PMC9574875
Funding
Financially supported by Akay Natural Ingredients, Cochin, India. FENUMAT™ and Hybrid-FENUMAT™ technologies are patented and registered by Akay Natural Ingredients. Life Extension (co-author affiliation) sells the FF-20 formulation commercially as Bio-Fisetin.
Competing interests
Four of six authors are employees of Akay Natural Ingredients, the patent holder for the tested formulation. Two of six authors are employees of Life Extension, which sells the FF-20 formulation commercially. The paper does not include a formal declaration of conflicts of interest section; the commercial relationships are disclosed in the acknowledgements.

Study snapshot

DesignSingle-dose, randomised, double-blinded, comparative crossover pharmacokinetic study
Model15 healthy adults (12 male, 3 female), aged 22–55 years, BMI 18–25 kg/m², recruited in Cochin, India. CTRI/2020/07/026748.
Sample21 screened, 15 randomised and completed both arms
Intervention1000 mg oral capsule (2 × 500 mg) of unformulated fisetin (UF, 98.2% purity from Rhus succedanea, delivering 982 mg fisetin) versus 1000 mg Hybrid-FENUMAT™ formulation (FF-20, 19.2% fisetin content, delivering 192 mg fisetin). Fasted state (≥10 h), 200 ± 10 ml water. Blood sampled at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 h post-dose.
DurationApproximately 3 weeks per participant: single dose on day 1 with 12-hour PK sampling, 10-day washout, second single dose with 12-hour PK sampling.
EndpointsPlasma fisetin Cmax; Plasma fisetin tmax; Plasma fisetin t1/2; Plasma fisetin AUC(0–12 h); Plasma geraldol pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, tmax, t1/2, AUC(0–12 h)); Adverse events

What the study showed, in plain terms

Krishnakumar and colleagues at Akay Natural Ingredients (Cochin, India), in collaboration with Life Extension (Fort Lauderdale, USA), conducted the first published human pharmacokinetic study of oral fisetin. Fifteen healthy adults each received two single doses in a randomised double-blind crossover: 1000 mg of unformulated fisetin (98.2% purity, delivering 982 mg of the compound) on one day, and 1000 mg of a hydrogel-encapsulated formulation called Hybrid-FENUMAT™ (labelled FF-20, containing only 19.2% fisetin, delivering 192 mg of the compound) on another. A 10-day washout separated the two doses. Plasma was sampled over 12 hours after each and analysed by UPLC-MS/MS for fisetin and its methoxylated metabolite geraldol.

The paper reports pharmacokinetic values adjusted to account for the different fisetin content of the two 1000 mg products: FF-20 delivered 192 mg fisetin and UF approximately 982 mg. After adjustment, reported peak parent-fisetin concentrations were 238.2 ng/mL for FF-20 and 9.97 ng/mL for UF (23.9-fold difference); reported 12-hour AUC was 341.4 versus 12.67 ng·h/mL (26.9-fold difference). The 9.97 ng/mL figure should NOT be presented as an unadjusted, directly observed peak after the 982 mg UF dose. Fisetin remained quantifiable longer with FF-20 under the study conditions. No significant adverse events were reported in this 15-person single-dose trial.

This manufacturer-funded study demonstrates a larger dose-adjusted exposure with the specific hybrid-hydrogel formulation. It did not compare food conditions, test senolytic activity or establish the human plasma or tissue concentration required for clinical efficacy. Numerical comparisons with cell-culture concentrations are not validated treatment thresholds; protein binding, exposure duration, metabolism and tissue distribution differ.

The critical caveat is the funding structure. Akay Natural Ingredients, which financially supported the study, holds the patents on both FENUMAT™ and Hybrid-FENUMAT™. Four of the six authors are Akay employees. The remaining two are employees of Life Extension, which sells the FF-20 formulation commercially as Bio-Fisetin. This does not invalidate the peer-reviewed PK measurements — the UPLC-MS/MS methodology is standard and the crossover design is appropriate — but it does mean the paper is a manufacturer-sponsored pharmacokinetic comparison of the manufacturer's own product against a generic comparator, without independent replication. Readers should weight the numbers accordingly.

Key findings

  • Dose-adjusted Cmax reported by the authors: FF-20, 238.2 ± 87.26 ng/mL; UF, 9.97 ± 3.97 ng/mL; 23.9-fold difference (p < 0.0001). Both results were adjusted for the different fisetin masses (192 mg in FF-20 versus approximately 982 mg in UF); do not report 9.97 as the unadjusted peak measured after the full UF dose.
  • Dose-adjusted AUC0–12 h reported by the authors: FF-20, 341.4 ± 130.05 ng·h/mL; UF, 12.67 ± 4.86 ng·h/mL; 26.9-fold difference (p < 0.0001). Values are not a like-for-like comparison of two products each containing the same amount of fisetin.
  • Fisetin remained quantifiable in plasma up to 8 hours after FF-20 dosing, versus only 2 hours after UF dosing.
  • Fisetin half-life (t½): 1.51 h (FF-20) versus 1.14 h (UF). Both intervals are short.
  • Time to peak (tmax): 1.24 h (FF-20) versus 0.88 h (UF).
  • Geraldol/fisetin AUC ratio: 0.67 with FF-20 versus 1.62 with UF — encapsulation appeared to reduce or delay conversion of fisetin to its methoxylated metabolite.
  • The 238.2 ng/mL FF-20 Cmax is a dose-adjusted comparison value, not the directly observed plasma peak after taking 192 mg actual fisetin. It must not be converted to an apparent 0.83 µM measured human exposure and compared directly with 1–5 µM cell-culture senolytic exposures. Neither parent-plasma values nor cell-culture data establish a validated human senolytic threshold, and the current 8 mg retail Bio-Fisetin capsule was not pharmacokinetically tested at its labeled serving dose in this trial.
  • No significant adverse events reported. Two participants reported mild gastrointestinal symptoms (bloating, decreased appetite) in both UF and FF-20 arms.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Industry funding with commercial conflicts of interest. The study was financially supported by Akay Natural Ingredients, which holds the FENUMAT™ and Hybrid-FENUMAT™ patents. Four of six authors are Akay employees. The remaining two authors are employees of Life Extension, which sells the FF-20 formulation commercially as Bio-Fisetin. This is a manufacturer-sponsored pharmacokinetic comparison of the manufacturer's own product against a generic comparator, without independent replication.
  • Single-dose only. No repeat-dose PK, no steady-state PK, no chronic tolerability data. Whether the observed exposure profile persists with repeated dosing, and whether accumulation occurs with continuous supplementation, is not addressed.
  • PK study, not efficacy study. The paper measures plasma concentrations of fisetin and geraldol only. It does not test senolytic activity, senescent-cell clearance, inflammatory-marker reduction, or any physiological outcome. Any editorial claim that this paper demonstrates a health benefit from fisetin misuses the data.
  • Small sample size skewed male. N=15 with 12 males and 3 females. Adequate for PK crossover analysis, but sex-stratified pharmacokinetic differences cannot be assessed. No older adults (age range 22–55), no participants with medical comorbidities, no participants outside the healthy BMI range (18–25).
  • No head-to-head against other formulations. Hybrid-FENUMAT™ is compared only against unformulated raw fisetin powder. Comparison to liposomal, phytosome, or other bioavailability-enhancing fisetin formulations is not provided. Whether the Akay formulation is superior to competing formulations remains untested.
  • Fisetin glucuronide and sulphate metabolites not measured. The paper measures unconjugated fisetin and geraldol only. Total fisetin exposure including phase II metabolites is unknown. The authors explicitly acknowledge this as a study limitation.
  • Dose adjustment and in-vitro translation. The paper reports Cmax and AUC adjusted for roughly fivefold differences in actual fisetin content; 9.97 ng/mL should not be presented as an unadjusted peak after the full 982 mg UF dose. The reported plasma measurements also cannot be used to infer a validated human senolytic threshold from cell-culture exposures.
  • Study population is Indian; extrapolation to other populations unstudied. Ethnic differences in flavonoid metabolism (CYP2C8, UGT genetic polymorphisms) are documented in the broader pharmacogenomics literature but not addressed here.
  • Retail-dose extrapolation. The 2022 FF-20 trial administered approximately 192 mg actual fisetin in a 1,000 mg formulation, while the currently marketed Bio-Fisetin capsule provides 8 mg. The trial cannot be used to claim the same Cmax or AUC for one retail capsule or to infer clinical efficacy at that label dose.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

12 articles

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified