Tier 1 — highest

Creatine supplementation for treating symptoms of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Igor Eckert, Júlia Lima, Andressa Amaral Dariva
Br J Nutr 2025 134(11):947-959

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 41189312
Funding
This research received no specific grant from public, commercial or not-for-profit funding agencies; CAPES Brazil and UFRGS provided institutional access to literature and had no role in the research.
Competing interests
All authors declared no conflicts of interest related to the work.

Study snapshot

DesignSystematic review and random-effects meta-analysis
ModelHuman
Sample11 trials; 1,093 participants
InterventionCreatine versus placebo in participants with or without depression
DurationVaried by included trial
EndpointsDepressive symptom scores; Remission; Treatment response

What the study showed, in plain terms

First quantitative synthesis focused on whether creatine supplementation improves depressive symptoms.

Key findings

The pooled effect suggested a small-to-moderate symptom benefit, but the average change was below a prespecified clinically important threshold, certainty was very low and bias could reduce or eliminate the apparent benefit.

What this study can and cannot tell us

Substantial heterogeneity, very-low-certainty evidence and signals of bias mean the true clinical effect may be trivial or null.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified