Tier 1 — highest
The Paradoxical Effect of Creatine Monohydrate on Muscle Damage Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sports Med
2022
52(7):1623-1645
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 35218552
- PubMed Central
- PMC9213373
- Funding
- Open-access funding was enabled and organized by CAUL and its member institutions; authors stated that no sources of funding were used to assist in preparation of the article.
- Competing interests
- Authors declared no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the article.
Study snapshot
| Design | Systematic review and meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| Model | Human |
| Sample | 23 studies; 240 creatine participants and 229 placebo participants |
| Intervention | Creatine monohydrate versus placebo around acute or chronic training-related muscle-damaging exercise |
| Duration | Varied; outcomes commonly analyzed at 24–36 and 48–90 hours after damaging exercise |
| Endpoints | Creatine kinase/LDH/myoglobin; Inflammation; Oxidative stress; DOMS; Muscle performance |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified

