Tier 2 — strong
Effects of Urolithin A supplementation on muscle health outcomes in humans from randomized controlled trials
Frontiers in Nutrition
2026
13:1834344
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 42559151
- PubMed Central
- PMC13440176
- Funding
- Korean ARPA-H / KHIDI Ministry of Health & Welfare (RS-2024-00507256); Korean NRF/MSIT (RS-2021-NR060106).
- Competing interests
- Authors declared no commercial or financial competing interests; the commercial funding of included trials should be evaluated separately.
Study snapshot
| Design | Systematic review and meta-analysis; search through 15 Dec 2025. |
|---|---|
| Model | Heterogeneous human populations receiving oral urolithin A vs placebo. |
| Sample | Five randomized trials; 236 participants; two trials pooled for six-minute walk distance. |
| Intervention | Not applicable to the review; it synthesized five randomized trials of urolithin A supplementation versus study-specific controls. |
| Duration | No original intervention or follow-up. Review search through 15 December 2025; individual trial durations varied. |
| Endpoints | 6-minute walk test; Strength; Endurance; Mitochondrial biomarkers |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
- Ca-AKG vs Urolithin A: human evidence and mechanisms comparedCa-AKG vs Urolithin A in 2026: Urolithin A has more direct human mitochondrial/muscle data; Ca-AKG has observational biological-age evidence. Neither has proven...Read analysis
- Fisetin vs Urolithin A: Senolytic vs Mitophagy (2026)Fisetin is studied for senotherapeutic effects; urolithin A targets mitophagy. Urolithin A has the more developed human intervention literature, while human systemic...Read analysis
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified



