Tier 3 — preclinical

Ingested nitrate and nitrite and stomach cancer risk: an updated review

Bryan NS, Alexander DD, Coughlin JR, Milkowski AL, Boffetta P

Food and Chemical Toxicology 2012 50(10):3646-3665

Bibliography

PubMed: PMID 22889895
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.062
Funding: The American Meat Institute Foundation provided support to conduct this review.
Competing interests: N.S. Bryan and The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston have financial interests in Neogenis, a company that develops, produces, and sells nitric-oxide-related products intended to improve health, develops diagnostics for nitric-oxide-related metabolites, and performs commercial measurement of nitric oxide metabolites in biological samples.

Why this tier. Narrative toxicological/epidemiological review, not a systematic review or meta-analysis - no pre-registered protocol, systematic search strategy, or formal risk-of-bias assessment. Full-text review confirms the review was funded by the American Meat Institute Foundation (a meat-industry trade body with a direct commercial interest in nitrite's safety profile, since nitrite is used to cure processed meat) and that the lead author discloses a financial interest in a nitric-oxide-related commercial products company. This funding and competing interest do not by themselves invalidate the animal toxicology data reviewed, but they are a material reason to weigh this review's reassurance alongside independently funded evidence, such as Said Abasse et al. 2022's systematic review and meta-analysis, rather than relying on it in isolation.

Study snapshot

Design	Narrative literature review (not a primary study)
Model	N/A - review of animal toxicology and human epidemiological cohort literature on nitrate/nitrite intake and stomach cancer
Sample	N/A - review
Intervention	N/A - review of dietary/endogenous nitrate and nitrite exposure
Duration	N/A - review
Endpoints	Stomach/gastric cancer risk associated with dietary nitrate and nitrite intake; Carcinogenicity of nitrite in animal models with vs without co-administered nitrosamine precursors; Role of protein S-nitrosation vs N-nitrosation in NO cell signalling

What the study showed, in plain terms

This review re-examines old assumptions that dietary nitrite and nitrate are dangerous food additives. It explains that most nitrate and nitrite in the body come from vegetables and normal cell metabolism, not processed meat, and that nitric oxide signalling itself depends partly on related nitrosation chemistry. Animal studies only show cancer-causing effects when nitrite is combined with a nitrosamine-forming chemical, and newer human studies find no consistent link between usual dietary nitrite or nitrate intake and stomach cancer.

Key findings

Nitrite and nitrate occur naturally in vegetables and are also added to cured/processed meats; historically both were treated as probable carcinogens under conditions allowing endogenous nitrosation.
A growing body of research instead frames dietary nitrate/nitrite as beneficial for cardiovascular health via nitric oxide production, given most exposure comes from vegetables and endogenous synthesis rather than processed meat.
Protein S-nitrosation (not just N-nitrosation, the pathway linked to carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds) is a normal and kinetically favoured part of NO cell signalling.
A critical review of the animal toxicology literature found no evidence of carcinogenesis from nitrite alone, in the absence of a co-administered nitrosamine-forming precursor.
Newly published prospective epidemiological cohort studies found no association between estimated dietary nitrate/nitrite intake and stomach cancer risk.

What this study can and cannot tell us

This is a non-systematic narrative review rather than a formally registered systematic review or meta-analysis. It does not resolve site-specific cancer signals (e.g., thyroid, glioma) later identified in nitrite-focused meta-analyses, and its central reassurance applies most directly to stomach cancer and to nitrate/nitrite from vegetable sources rather than processed meat, where accompanying compounds and cooking methods differ.

Full-text review confirms this review was funded by the American Meat Institute Foundation, and that lead author N.S. Bryan discloses a financial interest (alongside The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston) in Neogenis, a company that develops and commercially sells nitric-oxide-related products and diagnostics. Readers should weigh this review's favourable framing of nitrite/nitrate safety against its funding source, particularly given nitrite's role in curing the processed meats this industry body represents.

Tier 2

Association between Dietary Nitrate, Nitrite Intake, and Site-Specific Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Said Abasse K et al. · Nutrients · 2022

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Sep 7, 2026 Nitric Oxide: The Complete Guide to Boosting Your Body's Most Vital MoleculeWhat nitric oxide is, how your body makes it, why levels fall with age, and whether the supplements built around it are...Read analysis

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified 07 September 2026

Dr. Khaled Mahmoud, MBBChCritical Care Medicine, Longevity Science & Editorial Direction

Dr. Amr Yasser, PhDCardiometabolic, Musculoskeletal, Gut & Bioavailability

Dr. Abdulla Mostafa, PhDCellular Senescence, Neurological, Mitochondrial & Brain-Ageing Biology