Tier 1 — highest

Creatine supplementation and resistance training: a comparison between novice and experienced lifters - a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Damoon Ashtary-Larky, Shooka Mohammadi, Leila Hajizadeh, Seyed Amir Hossein Mousavi, Scott C Forbes, Darren G Candow, Jose Antonio
J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2025 22(Suppl 1):2586523

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 41433021
PubMed Central
PMC12777911
Funding
The authors reported no funding associated with the work.
Competing interests
Damoon Ashtary-Larky reported professional involvement in the health and nutrition industry; Scott C. Forbes reported creatine-company advisory and donation relationships; Jose Antonio reported ISSN leadership and supplement-company sponsorship relationships; Darren G. Candow reported industry-sponsored research, creatine donations, travel support, advisory-board roles and expert-witness/consulting work. Other authors declared no conflicts.

Study snapshot

DesignSystematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of controlled trials
ModelHuman evidence synthesis or trial
Sample61 trials
InterventionCreatine supplementation combined with resistance training versus control/placebo, stratified by trained versus untrained status
DurationVaried by included trial
EndpointsFat-free mass; Body mass; Fat mass; Body-fat percentage; BMI; Training-status moderation; Dose-response

What the study showed, in plain terms

2025 meta-analysis examining whether previous resistance-training experience changes body-composition responses to creatine.

Key findings

Creatine plus resistance training increased fat-free mass and body mass overall. Experienced lifters had numerically greater fat-free-mass gains than novices, but the between-group difference was not statistically significant.

What this study can and cannot tell us

Included trials varied in population, dose, duration and measurement methods; many underlying trials had industry support, and the apparent trained-versus-novice difference was not statistically significant.

Citation network

Articles citing this research paper

1 article

Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.

Editorial review

Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team

Last verified