Tier 1 — highest
Creatine supplementation and resistance training: a comparison between novice and experienced lifters - a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
J Int Soc Sports Nutr
2025
22(Suppl 1):2586523
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 41433021
- PubMed Central
- PMC12777911
- Funding
- The authors reported no funding associated with the work.
- Competing interests
- Damoon Ashtary-Larky reported professional involvement in the health and nutrition industry; Scott C. Forbes reported creatine-company advisory and donation relationships; Jose Antonio reported ISSN leadership and supplement-company sponsorship relationships; Darren G. Candow reported industry-sponsored research, creatine donations, travel support, advisory-board roles and expert-witness/consulting work. Other authors declared no conflicts.
Study snapshot
| Design | Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of controlled trials |
|---|---|
| Model | Human evidence synthesis or trial |
| Sample | 61 trials |
| Intervention | Creatine supplementation combined with resistance training versus control/placebo, stratified by trained versus untrained status |
| Duration | Varied by included trial |
| Endpoints | Fat-free mass; Body mass; Fat mass; Body-fat percentage; BMI; Training-status moderation; Dose-response |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified

