Tier 3 — preclinical
Intermittent supplementation with fisetin improves arterial function in old mice by decreasing cellular senescence
Aging Cell
2023
Volume 23, issue 3, article e14060
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 38062873
- PubMed Central
- PMC10928570
- Funding
- US National Institutes of Health grants (University of Colorado Boulder Department of Integrative Physiology); full grant numbers listed in the article's acknowledgments.
- Competing interests
- Not explicitly detailed in the retrieved abstract/metadata; readers should consult the full-text Conflict of Interest statement for details.
Study snapshot
| Design | In vivo study in old mice given intermittent oral fisetin supplementation, with ex vivo arterial function testing (endothelium-dependent dilation, arterial stiffness), genetic senolysis using p16-3MR transgenic mice, and in vitro human endothelial cell senescence assays. |
|---|---|
| Model | Old C57BL/6 mice and old p16-3MR transgenic mice (allowing genetic clearance of p16-positive senescent cells); primary human endothelial cell culture. |
| Sample | Group sizes not fully specified in the retrieved abstract; study used young and old mouse cohorts with and without fisetin supplementation and with and without genetic/pharmacologic senolysis. |
| Intervention | Oral intermittent fisetin supplementation in an on-off-on schedule (1 week on, 2 weeks off, 1 week on) in old mice; genetic (ganciclovir-induced) senescent cell clearance in p16-3MR mice for comparison. |
| Duration | Arterial and senescence outcomes assessed 1 week after the final dose of the intermittent fisetin regimen. |
| Endpoints | Vascular cell senescence markers and SASP-related inflammation; Endothelium-dependent dilation (endothelial function); Nitric oxide bioavailability and cellular/mitochondrial oxidative stress; Arterial stiffness (mechanical wall stiffness); Arterial wall remodeling |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified



