Tier 2 — strong
Anti-inflammatory effects of nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) in human skeletal muscle after BFR-exercise
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
2026
Volume 23, issue 1, article 2632284
Bibliography
- PubMed
- PMID 41705654
- PubMed Central
- PMC12918316
- Funding
- The present study is sponsored by National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, Grant number: 108-2410-H-845-022-MY3.
- Competing interests
- No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Study snapshot
| Design | Randomized, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced crossover trial with participant and experimenter blinding. Muscle biopsies were obtained before, immediately after, and 24 h after BFR-exercise. The abstract reports a 3-week washout between conditions, while the Methods describes crossover after a 4-week washout. |
|---|---|
| Model | Untrained young men (22.8 ± 1.5 y) with prior weight-training experience; vastus lateralis muscle biopsies analysed for mRNA (RT-PCR) and immunofluorescence (TOM20, MPO, p16INK4a, COX4, DAPI). |
| Sample | n=11 (15 enrolled, 4 withdrew for scheduling). |
| Intervention | Oral gelatin capsules containing 300 mg NMN (AbinoNutra) four times daily (total 1200 mg/d) or 300 mg cornstarch placebo, for 7 consecutive days before and including the BFR-exercise day. The paper reports the crossover washout inconsistently: 3 weeks in the abstract/study-design description and 4 weeks later in Methods. Pre-exercise stimulus: three cycles of 5-min thigh-cuff occlusion at 180 mmHg, then 4 × 8 back squats at 70% 1-RM. |
| Duration | Seven days of supplementation per condition with a 24-hour post-exercise recovery window. The paper is internally inconsistent on crossover washout: 3 weeks in the abstract versus 4 weeks in the Methods. |
| Endpoints | TNF-α mRNA in muscle (RT-PCR); IL-10 mRNA in muscle; p21 mRNA in muscle; Nucleated cell infiltration in necrotic regions (DAPI); Mitochondrial content in muscle tissue (TOM20 immunofluorescence); Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) |
What the study showed, in plain terms
Key findings
What this study can and cannot tell us
Citation network
Articles citing this research paper
Biohack Blueprint analyses that reference this study in their evidence base.
- Ca-AKG vs NMN: mechanisms and human evidence comparedCa-AKG vs NMN in 2026: NMN has stronger randomized NAD+ target-engagement data; Ca-AKG has an observational biological-age signal. Neither has proven human...Read analysis
- NMN for Muscle, Exercise & Physical Performance: Human EvidenceNMN has produced aerobic-capacity, walking and selected grip signals, but systematic evidence does not show reliable muscle growth. A 2026 BFR study...Read analysis
- NMN for Men: Testosterone, Muscle, Energy, Fertility & SafetyMen are heavily represented in NMN trials, but testosterone, sperm, erectile-function and muscle-building claims remain unproven. This page separates male-specific data from...Read analysis
- NMN and Resveratrol: Should You Take Them Together?NMN and resveratrol are a popular longevity stack, but human synergy is unproven. We examine the mouse combination study, tissue NAD+ results,...Read analysis
- NMN Human Trials: Published Clinical Evidence Mapped and ExplainedThis living evidence map separates independent NMN trials from post-hoc and secondary publications, covering safety, NAD+, insulin sensitivity, exercise, sleep, blood pressure,...Read analysis
- NMN Dosage: Human Doses From 100 mg to 2,000 mg ExplainedHuman NMN studies span roughly 250 to 2,000 mg/day, but no trial has established a universal anti-aging dose. This guide maps doses...Read analysis
- NMN Benefits: What Human Trials and Meta-Analyses Actually ShowNMN reliably raises NAD+ in human trials, including a new 24-week high-dose RCT, but broader clinical benefits remain mixed. This 2026 review...Read analysis
Editorial review
Reviewed by the Biohack Blueprint research team
Last verified



