Tier 2 — strong

Enhanced bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of a novel hybrid-hydrogel formulation of fisetin orally administered in healthy individuals: a randomised double-blinded comparative crossover study

Illathu Madhavamenon Krishnakumar, Asha Jaja-Chimedza, Ashil Joseph, Abhilash Balakrishnan, Balu Maliakel, Andrew Swick
Journal of Nutritional Science 2022 11:e74

Bibliography

PubMed
PMID 36304817
PubMed Central
PMC9574875
Funding
Financially supported by Akay Natural Ingredients, Cochin, India. FENUMAT™ and Hybrid-FENUMAT™ technologies are patented and registered by Akay Natural Ingredients. Life Extension (co-author affiliation) sells the FF-20 formulation commercially as Bio-Fisetin.
Competing interests
Four of six authors are employees of Akay Natural Ingredients, the patent holder for the tested formulation. Two of six authors are employees of Life Extension, which sells the FF-20 formulation commercially. The paper does not include a formal declaration of conflicts of interest section; the commercial relationships are disclosed in the acknowledgements.

Study snapshot

DesignSingle-dose, randomised, double-blinded, comparative crossover pharmacokinetic study
Model15 healthy adults (12 male, 3 female), aged 22–55 years, BMI 18–25 kg/m², recruited in Cochin, India. CTRI/2020/07/026748.
Sample21 screened, 15 randomised and completed both arms
Intervention1000 mg oral capsule (2 × 500 mg) of unformulated fisetin (UF, 98.2% purity from Rhus succedanea, delivering 982 mg fisetin) versus 1000 mg Hybrid-FENUMAT™ formulation (FF-20, 19.2% fisetin content, delivering 192 mg fisetin). Fasted state (≥10 h), 200 ± 10 ml water. Blood sampled at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 h post-dose.
DurationApproximately 3 weeks per participant: single dose on day 1 with 12-hour PK sampling, 10-day washout, second single dose with 12-hour PK sampling.
EndpointsPlasma fisetin Cmax; Plasma fisetin tmax; Plasma fisetin t1/2; Plasma fisetin AUC(0–12 h); Plasma geraldol pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, tmax, t1/2, AUC(0–12 h)); Adverse events

What the study showed, in plain terms

Krishnakumar and colleagues at Akay Natural Ingredients (Cochin, India), in collaboration with Life Extension (Fort Lauderdale, USA), conducted the first published human pharmacokinetic study of oral fisetin. Fifteen healthy adults each received two single doses in a randomised double-blind crossover: 1000 mg of unformulated fisetin (98.2% purity, delivering 982 mg of the compound) on one day, and 1000 mg of a hydrogel-encapsulated formulation called Hybrid-FENUMAT™ (labelled FF-20, containing only 19.2% fisetin, delivering 192 mg of the compound) on another. A 10-day washout separated the two doses. Plasma was sampled over 12 hours after each and analysed by UPLC-MS/MS for fisetin and its methoxylated metabolite geraldol.

The bioavailability enhancement was substantial. Peak plasma fisetin concentration was 238.2 ng/ml after FF-20 versus 9.97 ng/ml after unformulated fisetin — dose-normalised, a 23.9-fold increase in Cmax and a 26.9-fold increase in AUC(0–12 h). Fisetin remained detectable in plasma for 8 hours after the formulated dose but only 2 hours after the unformulated dose. The formulation also reduced conversion of fisetin to geraldol, suggesting protection from first-pass metabolism. No significant adverse events were reported.

The editorial significance is real: this is the peer-reviewed evidence that formulation can meaningfully close the fisetin bioavailability gap, and it is the study the pillar article's "the bioavailability problem" section is anchored on. Unformulated fisetin at 1000 mg produces plasma concentrations 30 to 150-fold below the in vitro senolytic window (1–5 μM). The formulated version gets much closer — 238 ng/ml is approximately 0.83 μM, just below the low end of the senolytic window — but still does not clearly reach the concentration at which fisetin selectively kills senescent cells in the dish.

The critical caveat is the funding structure. Akay Natural Ingredients, which financially supported the study, holds the patents on both FENUMAT™ and Hybrid-FENUMAT™. Four of the six authors are Akay employees. The remaining two are employees of Life Extension, which sells the FF-20 formulation commercially as Bio-Fisetin. This does not invalidate the peer-reviewed PK measurements — the UPLC-MS/MS methodology is standard and the crossover design is appropriate — but it does mean the paper is a manufacturer-sponsored pharmacokinetic comparison of the manufacturer's own product against a generic comparator, without independent replication. Readers should weight the numbers accordingly.

Key findings

  • Peak plasma fisetin (Cmax): 238.2 ± 87.26 ng/ml after Hybrid-FENUMAT™ (FF-20) versus 9.97 ± 3.97 ng/ml after unformulated fisetin (UF). Dose-normalised increase = 23.9-fold (p < 0.0001).
  • Fisetin systemic exposure (AUC0–12 h): 341.4 ± 130.05 ng·h/ml (FF-20) versus 12.67 ± 4.86 ng·h/ml (UF). Dose-normalised increase = 26.9-fold (p < 0.0001).
  • Fisetin remained quantifiable in plasma up to 8 hours after FF-20 dosing, versus only 2 hours after UF dosing.
  • Fisetin half-life (t½): 1.51 h (FF-20) versus 1.14 h (UF). Both intervals are short.
  • Time to peak (tmax): 1.24 h (FF-20) versus 0.88 h (UF).
  • Geraldol/fisetin AUC ratio: 0.67 with FF-20 versus 1.62 with UF — encapsulation appeared to reduce or delay conversion of fisetin to its methoxylated metabolite.
  • Even with the formulation improvement, peak plasma fisetin of 238 ng/ml (≈0.83 μM) remained just below the low end of the in vitro senolytic window (1–5 μM, or ≈286–1430 ng/ml at fisetin's molecular weight of 286.24 g/mol).
  • No significant adverse events reported. Two participants reported mild gastrointestinal symptoms (bloating, decreased appetite) in both UF and FF-20 arms.

What this study can and cannot tell us

  • Industry funding with commercial conflicts of interest. The study was financially supported by Akay Natural Ingredients, which holds the FENUMAT™ and Hybrid-FENUMAT™ patents. Four of six authors are Akay employees. The remaining two authors are employees of Life Extension, which sells the FF-20 formulation commercially as Bio-Fisetin. This is a manufacturer-sponsored pharmacokinetic comparison of the manufacturer's own product against a generic comparator, without independent replication.
  • Single-dose only. No repeat-dose PK, no steady-state PK, no chronic tolerability data. Whether the observed exposure profile persists with repeated dosing, and whether accumulation occurs with continuous supplementation, is not addressed.
  • PK study, not efficacy study. The paper measures plasma concentrations of fisetin and geraldol only. It does not test senolytic activity, senescent-cell clearance, inflammatory-marker reduction, or any physiological outcome. Any editorial claim that this paper demonstrates a health benefit from fisetin misuses the data.
  • Small sample size skewed male. N=15 with 12 males and 3 females. Adequate for PK crossover analysis, but sex-stratified pharmacokinetic differences cannot be assessed. No older adults (age range 22–55), no participants with medical comorbidities, no participants outside the healthy BMI range (18–25).
  • No head-to-head against other formulations. Hybrid-FENUMAT™ is compared only against unformulated raw fisetin powder. Comparison to liposomal, phytosome, or other bioavailability-enhancing fisetin formulations is not provided. Whether the Akay formulation is superior to competing formulations remains untested.
  • Fisetin glucuronide and sulphate metabolites not measured. The paper measures unconjugated fisetin and geraldol only. Total fisetin exposure including phase II metabolites is unknown. The authors explicitly acknowledge this as a study limitation.
  • Peak plasma concentration still below the in vitro senolytic window. Even the improved formulation produced Cmax of ≈0.83 μM — just below the 1–5 μM concentration range at which fisetin selectively kills senescent cells in cell culture. Whether the formulation delivers concentrations sufficient for the senolytic mechanism at recommended dietary supplement doses is not demonstrated.
  • Study population is Indian; extrapolation to other populations unstudied. Ethnic differences in flavonoid metabolism (CYP2C8, UGT genetic polymorphisms) are documented in the broader pharmacogenomics literature but not addressed here.
Reviewed by , Medical Advisory Board · Last verified against PubMed on 21 July 2026